<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Vlad Tatarincevs's Lotus Domino Blog | Comments</title><description>Latvia Lotus User Group (www.vlaad.lv)</description><link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:26:14 +0300</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>IBM make admins/user happy with DAOS, Microsoft is far behind</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:26:14 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lars Berntrop-Bos</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM make admins/user happy with DAOS, Microsoft is far behind</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[heh. inserted migration option to Domino anyway. Let's stir up!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[heh. inserted migration option to Domino anyway. Let's stir up!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/ibm-make-admins-happy-with-daos-ms-is-faaaaar-behind?opendocument&amp;comments#02082012042614PMORIJXF.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM make admins/user happy with DAOS, Microsoft is far behind</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:53:46 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Christian Tillmanns</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM make admins/user happy with DAOS, Microsoft is far behind</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[If you look at the comments of that link, the Exchange gurus are not very concerned about that change. 20% is probably correct, since Exchange uses not just one database and the SIS does only work in the same database.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you look at the comments of that link, the Exchange gurus are not very concerned about that change. 20% is probably correct, since Exchange uses not just one database and the SIS does only work in the same database.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/ibm-make-admins-happy-with-daos-ms-is-faaaaar-behind?opendocument&amp;comments#07.02.2012095346ORIBA6.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:01:58 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vlaad</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[web admin is good for servers that have HTTP running :)<br /><br />Yes, I am aware of webadmin.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[web admin is good for servers that have HTTP running :)<br /><br />Yes, I am aware of webadmin.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/lotus-domino-administrator-on-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#01262012120158AMORITUA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:50:58 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lars Berntrop-Bos</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Did you try the Webadmin that is already available?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Did you try the Webadmin that is already available?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/lotus-domino-administrator-on-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#01252012025058PMORIH3W.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:47:34 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vlaad</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thank for link Paul :)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank for link Paul :)]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/lotus-domino-administrator-on-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#01252012014734PMORIFUA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:41:01 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Paul Mooney</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Domino Administrator on Mac?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[{ <a href="http://www.pmooney.net/2009/01/a-domino-administrator-client-for-mac-and-linux-a-bad-idea/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.pmooney.net/2009/01/a-domino-administrator-client-for-mac-and-linux-a-bad-idea/">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[{ <a href="http://www.pmooney.net/2009/01/a-domino-administrator-client-for-mac-and-linux-a-bad-idea/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.pmooney.net/2009/01/a-domino-administrator-client-for-mac-and-linux-a-bad-idea/">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/lotus-domino-administrator-on-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#01252012014101PMORIFQ7.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>nice new feature of smartupgade </title>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:13:13 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>nice new feature of smartupgade </dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[+1 to the DOWNGRADE ALLClients installation feature request]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[+1 to the DOWNGRADE ALLClients installation feature request]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/new-feature-of-smartupgade-?opendocument&amp;comments#01062012081313PMORIPDB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>very good notes.ini analyzer</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:49:20 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>very good notes.ini analyzer</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[The link is broken.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The link is broken.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/very-good-notes.ini-analyzer?opendocument&amp;comments#12122011024920PMORIH2V.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>It&#8217;s no longer there....</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:05:33 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dana B.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>very good notes.ini analyzer</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[The link results in a 404]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The link results in a 404]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/very-good-notes.ini-analyzer?opendocument&amp;comments#11102011090533PMORIQE2.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Traveler is great, except Contact syncronization module</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:15:07 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Antoine Rinié</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Traveler is great, except Contact syncronization module</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi ,<br /><br />We have several users reporting the issue, we thought initially that they didn't choose "merge" as requested but it seems that they did.<br /><br />IBM isn't aware of that ... Did you find a workaround since then ? <br /><br />Disabling contacts sync as you did might be a solution but it seems to be no way to prevent users enabling the contact feature if they want. How do you do that ?<br /><br />Thank you !]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi ,<br /><br />We have several users reporting the issue, we thought initially that they didn't choose "merge" as requested but it seems that they did.<br /><br />IBM isn't aware of that ... Did you find a workaround since then ? <br /><br />Disabling contacts sync as you did might be a solution but it seems to be no way to prevent users enabling the contact feature if they want. How do you do that ?<br /><br />Thank you !]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/lotus-traveler-is-great-except-contact-syncronization-module?opendocument&amp;comments#28092011131507ORIE2H.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0  Operation could not be completed.  (DAErrorDomain error 0.)   problem</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:12:03 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>crispy235</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0 &quot;Operation could not be completed.&quot; (DAErrorDomain error 0.)&quot;  problem</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Many thanks - your posting saved us a lot of time on client site!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Many thanks - your posting saved us a lot of time on client site!]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/traveler-config-on-alternative-port-solution-for-error-domaindaerrordomain-code0-operation-could-not-be-completed.-daerrordomain-error-0.-problem?opendocument&amp;comments#16092011121203ORICT4.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>DAMN! Domino data can be deleted during server shutdown on UNIX and Linux platforms.  VERY BAD SPR!</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:24:38 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vlaad</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>DAMN! Domino data can be deleted during server shutdown on UNIX and Linux platforms.  VERY BAD SPR!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think nobody want to start they working day restoring server from backup(as mentioned in technote). I checked all my customers servers, this file does not exists, so it would be really good if IBM can tell a bit more, in what cases this file is created. my production server also runs on linux...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think nobody want to start they working day restoring server from backup(as mentioned in technote). I checked all my customers servers, this file does not exists, so it would be really good if IBM can tell a bit more, in what cases this file is created. my production server also runs on linux...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/damn-domino-data-can-be-deleted-during-server-shutdown-on-unix-and-linux-platforms.-very-bad-spr?opendocument&amp;comments#06022011112438AMORIBVF.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Has anyone had this happen? How prevelant is it...</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2011 23:33:33 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>rob axelrod</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>DAMN! Domino data can be deleted during server shutdown on UNIX and Linux platforms.  VERY BAD SPR!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I have customers freaking out about this (rightfully so since if it does happen the result is catastrophic) but I've been running 8.5.2 FP1 on lots of AIX servers since it came out and those servers have been restarted lots of times and I've never seen this. I wish they would give a bit more info related to what environmental factors need to be in play to set up this scenario and little things like is it enough to delete the ~notetmp.reg file while the server is running?<br /><br />Rob]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have customers freaking out about this (rightfully so since if it does happen the result is catastrophic) but I've been running 8.5.2 FP1 on lots of AIX servers since it came out and those servers have been restarted lots of times and I've never seen this. I wish they would give a bit more info related to what environmental factors need to be in play to set up this scenario and little things like is it enough to delete the ~notetmp.reg file while the server is running?<br /><br />Rob]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/damn-domino-data-can-be-deleted-during-server-shutdown-on-unix-and-linux-platforms.-very-bad-spr?opendocument&amp;comments#06012011113333PMORIS52.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>DAMN! Domino data can be deleted during server shutdown on UNIX and Linux platforms.  VERY BAD SPR!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:19:21 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Paul Mooney</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>DAMN! Domino data can be deleted during server shutdown on UNIX and Linux platforms.  VERY BAD SPR!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Mind blowingly crappy epic FAIL of a bug]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mind blowingly crappy epic FAIL of a bug]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/damn-domino-data-can-be-deleted-during-server-shutdown-on-unix-and-linux-platforms.-very-bad-spr?opendocument&amp;comments#06012011041921PMORIHMN.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>strange... can&#8217;t find Lotus Workflow in IBM Fix central</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:22:53 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Simon O&#8217;Doherty</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>strange... can&#8217;t find Lotus Workflow in IBM Fix central</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[LWF7 is still supported under Domino R8. As far as I know it is not supported under Domino R7, but I am awaiting confirmation on that.<br /><br />We don't get that many PMRs opened for the product and when we do most of the time the customers environment changes resolves the issue, rather then an actual bug in the product. <br /><br />So if you have an issue in 8.5.2 please open a PMR. Thanks.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LWF7 is still supported under Domino R8. As far as I know it is not supported under Domino R7, but I am awaiting confirmation on that.<br /><br />We don't get that many PMRs opened for the product and when we do most of the time the customers environment changes resolves the issue, rather then an actual bug in the product. <br /><br />So if you have an issue in 8.5.2 please open a PMR. Thanks.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/stange...-cant-find-lotus-workflow-in-ibm-fix-central?opendocument&amp;comments#05252011112253AMORIBUC.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>strange... can&#8217;t find Lotus Workflow in IBM Fix central</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:22:06 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Ruhnau</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>strange... can&#8217;t find Lotus Workflow in IBM Fix central</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[It is still sold (as far as I know) and works rather stable in our environment. But IBM almost has not touched the code in the last few years. As far as I can see the suite still runs on the code as of R6...]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is still sold (as far as I know) and works rather stable in our environment. But IBM almost has not touched the code in the last few years. As far as I can see the suite still runs on the code as of R6...]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/stange...-cant-find-lotus-workflow-in-ibm-fix-central?opendocument&amp;comments#25052011112206ORIBTV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0  Operation could not be completed.  (DAErrorDomain error 0.)   problem</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 05:48:56 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0 &quot;Operation could not be completed.&quot; (DAErrorDomain error 0.)&quot;  problem</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />I figured it out. It should not have an ({ <a href="http://" target="_blank" title="Link: ">Link</a> } ) prefix. It should be:<br /><br />domain.com:8080/servlet/traveler<br /><br />all working now]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />I figured it out. It should not have an ({ <a href="http://" target="_blank" title="Link: ">Link</a> } ) prefix. It should be:<br /><br />domain.com:8080/servlet/traveler<br /><br />all working now]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/traveler-config-on-alternative-port-solution-for-error-domaindaerrordomain-code0-operation-could-not-be-completed.-daerrordomain-error-0.-problem?opendocument&amp;comments#05232011054856AMORI5BM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0  Operation could not be completed.  (DAErrorDomain error 0.)   problem</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 18:34:38 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Traveler config on alternative port, solution for Error Domain=DAErrorDomain Code=0 &quot;Operation could not be completed.&quot; (DAErrorDomain error 0.)&quot;  problem</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[hi peeps,<br /><br />our homepage has :8080.. so is it safe to replace hosts with http_domain.com:8080/servlet/traveler in the Apple.XML file? Shall I also add SSL =TRUE?<br /><br />thank you]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[hi peeps,<br /><br />our homepage has :8080.. so is it safe to replace hosts with http_domain.com:8080/servlet/traveler in the Apple.XML file? Shall I also add SSL =TRUE?<br /><br />thank you]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/traveler-config-on-alternative-port-solution-for-error-domaindaerrordomain-code0-operation-could-not-be-completed.-daerrordomain-error-0.-problem?opendocument&amp;comments#05202011063438PMORILA7.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>jvm.properties again, should it be in policy or have higher default value?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 19:53:36 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Vlaad</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>jvm.properties again, should it be in policy or have higher default value?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, Marc, great code, <br /><br />I am afraid it will work for users with Admin rights. <br /><br />if end-user has limited OS access, it will not work :(<br /><br />I expect this to be included in IBM Lotus, and to be controlled via policy.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi, Marc, great code, <br /><br />I am afraid it will work for users with Admin rights. <br /><br />if end-user has limited OS access, it will not work :(<br /><br />I expect this to be included in IBM Lotus, and to be controlled via policy.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/jvm.properties-again?opendocument&amp;comments#05122011075336PMORIMTK.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>jvm.properties again, should it be in policy or have higher default value?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:29:43 +0300</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Marc Champoux</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>jvm.properties again, should it be in policy or have higher default value?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Vlad! In my case, I wrote this button to help my employees with their Lotus Notes jvm.properties file modifications ... grab the code here: { <a href="http://www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=345" target="_blank" title="Link: www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=345">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Vlad! In my case, I wrote this button to help my employees with their Lotus Notes jvm.properties file modifications ... grab the code here: { <a href="http://www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=345" target="_blank" title="Link: www.thenewdominoadmin.com/blog/?p=345">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.vlaad.lv/lotus.nsf/dx/jvm.properties-again?opendocument&amp;comments#05122011042943PMORIHU5.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>

